<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DevOps on Jesse Dearing</title>
    <link>https://jesse.dev/tags/devops/</link>
    <description>Recent content in DevOps on Jesse Dearing</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:06:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jesse.dev/tags/devops/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Fixed vs. Growth System Failures</title>
      <link>https://jesse.dev/post/20161019-fixed-vs-growth-system-failures/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:06:08 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jesse.dev/post/20161019-fixed-vs-growth-system-failures/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of Mindset based on the work: &lt;a href=&#34;http://amzn.to/2dEPR9M&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;Mindset by Dr. Carol S. Dweck,&#xA;Ph.D.&lt;/a&gt;&#xA;has been around for some time now, but recently I was thinking about root cause&#xA;analyses meant as a tool for learning. Revisiting the John Allspaw post: The&#xA;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.kitchensoap.com/2014/11/14/the-infinite-hows-or-the-dangers-of-the-five-whys/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;Infinite Hows (or, the Dangers Of The Five&#xA;Whys)&lt;/a&gt; make me start thinking about&#xA;what makes a lot of people look at postmortems as a checkbox or paperwork and&#xA;not value them as learning experiences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
